NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Secured Lending 1 Pty Ltd v Mahmassani [2021] NSWSC 811 Hearing dates: 15 – 19 March 2021 Date of orders: 7 July 2021 Decision date: 07 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: 1. The amended cross-claim is dismissed. 2. The cross-claimants are to pay the first and second cross-defendants' costs. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONS – legal practitioners – duties and liabilities – duties to client – cross-claimants asked by son to help repay his debts by using cross-claimants' home as security – short term loan where exit strategy was sale of security property to son - default under loan agreement and mortgage – where proceedings by lender compromised – cross-claim against solicitor - whether solicitor failed to explain loan agreement and mortgage to cross-claimants – whether solicitor was negligent and breached retainer – where in absence of a letter written following client conference solicitor recorded advice in a file note – where satisfied that solicitor explained nature of loan and consequences if loan not repaid – where failure to complete documents in approved form not evidence of negligence – where even if breach of duty, causation not established as cross-claimants would have gone ahead with arrangement –whether conduct of solicitor was unconscionable – where conduct not unconscionable simply because clients were in disadvantaged position – whether conduct of solicitor was misleading and deceptive – cross-claim dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 5D Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Legal Practice (Solicitors) Rules 2015 (NSW) r 11 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) s 57 Cases Cited: ANZ Banking Group Ltd v Bragg (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 208 Artahs Pty Ltd v Gall Standfield & Smith (A Firm) [2012] QCA 272 Banco Exterior Internacional v Mann (1955) 1 All ER 936 Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Gestmin SGPS S.A. v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd [2013] EWHC 3560 (Comm) Girardet v Crease & Co (1987) 11 BCLR (2d) 361 Meakin v R [2018] NSWCCA 288 Morlend Finance Corporation (Vic) Pty Ltd v Westendorp [1993] 2 VR 284 Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyd's Rep 403 Permanent Building Society v Wheeler (1994) 14 ACSR 109 Provident Capital Ltd v Papa [2013] NSWCA 36 RHG Mortgage Limited v Rosario Ianni [2015] NSWCA 56 Studer v Boettcher [2000] NSWCA 263 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Khaled Mahmassani (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Ghada Mahmassani (Second Cross-Claimant) Ammar Jamal-Eddine (First Cross-Defendant) Concordia Legal Pty Ltd (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Tibbey (Defendant/Cross-Claimants) D Priestley SC (Cross-Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate