NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sigalla v R (No 2) [2021] NSWCCA 151 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 07 July 2021 Decision date: 07 July 2021 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL Brereton JA Cavanagh J Decision: Leave to make an application under (NSW) Criminal Appeal Rules 1952, r 50C, refused. Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – Court of Criminal Appeal – Application for leave to re-open – Principles governing – Whether failure to consider ground of appeal – Whether various misapprehensions of fact and law – No slip, oversight, or misapprehension identified – Attempt to reargue appeal on grounds not previously advanced – Whether Kentwell error – Leave refused SENTENCING – Appeal against sentence – Role of appellate court – Re-exercising the sentencing discretion afresh – Adopting findings of primary judge – Effect of Kentwell v The Queen Legislation Cited: (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 184(2)(a) (CTH) Crimes Act 1914, s 16A (NSW) Criminal Appeal Rules 1952, rr 4, 50C (NSW) Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021, r 5.4 Cases Cited: Alramadan v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2) [2008] NSWCCA 69 Application of Ainsley Whitney [2020] NSWCCA 146 Application of Malcolm Potier (No 3) [2015] NSWCCA 306 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6 Baghdadi v R (No 2) [2012] NSWCCA 77 Burrell v The Queen (2008) 238 CLR 218; [2008] HCA 34 Corliss v R (No 2) [2020] NSWCCA 180 Dickson v R (No 2) [2018] NSWCCA 183 El Ali v R (No 2) [2019] NSWCCA 289 Elliot v The Queen (2007) 234 CLR 38; [2007] HCA 51 Kauwenberghs v R (Cth) [2009] NSWCCA 201 Kentwell v R (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Miller v R (No 2) (2016) 260 A Crim R 554; [2016] NSWCCA 158 RO v R [2019] NSWCCA 183 Sigalla v R [2021] NSWCCA 22 Simmons v R (No 2) [2020] NSWCCA 29 Turnbull v R [2019] NSWCCA 97 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Andrew John Sigalla (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Applicant) T McDonald SC, T Epstein (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate