NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Schokman v Link Wentworth Housing Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 203 Hearing dates: 28 June 2021 Date of orders: 07 July 2021 Decision date: 07 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member D Goldstein, Senior Member Decision: (1) The name of the respondent is amended to Link Wentworth Housing Limited. (2) Leave to appeal granted. (3) Appeal allowed. (4) Orders (1) to (5) in matter SH 21/02037 vacated and in lieu thereof order: (a) the appellant to pay the respondent rental arrears of $4,327.92 for rent owed for the period from 26 October to 15 April 2021 on or before 18 August 2021; (b) the appellant to pay the respondent rental arrears of $101.82 for water usage owed for the period from 26 October to 15 April 2021 on or before 18 August 2021; (c) the appellant to pay the respondent rent, presently $358.28 per fortnight, next payment due on 12 July 2021, and once the arrears are paid in full, to pay rent in accordance with the residential tenancy agreement; (d) the appellant to pay the respondent water usage, presently $7.44 per fortnight, next payment due on 12 July 2021, and once the arrears are paid in full, to pay water usage in accordance with the residential tenancy agreement; (e) if the orders in respect of rent and water are not complied with than at any time before 7 October 2021 the respondent may request the listing of the application to determine whether the tenancy should be terminated before the Tribunal. Catchwords: LEASES AND TENANCIES — identity of landlord — effect of concurrent leases under s 13A of Housing Act 2001 (NSW) — where rent paid in error to incorrect landlord Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 81 Housing Act 2001 (NSW), s 13A Cases Cited: Commissioner of Police v DYD [2020] NSWCATAP 224 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 390; [2010] HCA 32 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Reisner v Bridge Housing Limited [2019] NSWCATAP 109 Trust Co of Australia v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2006] NSWSC 792 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maurice Schokman (Appellant) Link Wentworth Housing Limited (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Appellant (self-represented) N Cureton (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00118009 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: Not reported Date of Decision: 15 April 2021 Before: E Sarofim, Member File Number(s): SH 21/02037
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate