NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wollongong City Council v Williams [2021] NSWCA 140 Hearing dates: 15 June 2021 Decision date: 09 July 2021 Before: McCallum JA at [1]; Simpson AJA at [19]; Adamson J at [34] Decision: (1) The appeal be dismissed. (2) The cross-appeal be allowed. (3) The parties bring in a form of order calculating the judgment amount within 7 days. (4) The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal and the cross-appeal. Catchwords: TORTS — Negligence — Appellant injured as a result of falling on the first step on a stepped path in a park — Whether the primary judge erred in finding that the appellant had breached the duty of care which it owed to the respondent — Primary judge found the respondent to be a witness of credit who maintained that he was taking care and was not distracted —Experts agreed that single steps presented a hazard — Primary judge was not in error in finding that the appellant failed to take reasonable precautions against the risk of harm and was negligent — Appeal dismissed NEGLIGENCE — Cross Appeal — Damages — Challenged findings of contributory negligence and discount of damages for past economic loss — Primary judge concluded that contributory negligence was established — Finding of contributory negligence not contradicted by the finding of liability — No want of reasonable care on the part of the respondent that might have contributed to his failure to perceive the steps — Primary judge reduced the appellant's damages for past economic loss by 10% to allow for circumstances in the respondent's circumstances that would have caused him to retire earlier — Where primary judge made no express finding on the degree of probability that the respondent would have retired before 66 — Evidence accepted by the primary judge contradicted the prospect of early retirement — The discount of 10% was inconsistent with the positive findings of the primary judge — Cross-appeal allowed Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5C, 5F, 5H, 5R, 13 Cases Cited: Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1983] 1 NSWLR 1 Astley v Austrust Ltd (1999) 197 CLR 1; [1999] HCA 6 Bendix Mintex Pty Ltd v Barnes (1997) 42 NSWLR 307 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council; Ghantous v Hawkesbury City Council (2001) 206 CLR 512; [2001] HCA 29 Butterfield v Forrester (1809) 103 ER 926 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472; [1993] HCA 78 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638; [1990] HCA 20 Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201 Ratewave Pty Limited v Illingby [2017] NSWCA 103 Thompson v Woolworths (Q'land) Pty Ltd (2005) 221 CLR 234; [2005] HCA 19 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wollongong City Council (Appellant) Bernard Roy Williams (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Sexton SC (Appellant) R Sheldon SC / R O'Keefe / A Lim (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate