Himo v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 191

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Himo v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 191 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 9 July 2021 Decision date: 09 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Naida Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 59 of the ADR Act, the Respondent (the Commissioner) not be required to lodge copies of the documents (the Confidential Material) specified in the Confidential Statement provided in support of the application and provided to the Tribunal in accordance with the order of the Tribunal (the Confidential Statement); (2) Pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the CAT Act, the publication of the Confidential Material and the Confidential Statement or matters contained in the Confidential Material and the Confidential Statement is prohibited; (3) Pursuant to s 64(1)(d) of the CAT Act, the disclosure of the Confidential Material and the Confidential Statement or matters contained in the Confidential Material and the Confidential Statement is restricted to the Commissioner, the legal representatives for the Commissioner and the Tribunal. Catchwords: LICENSING – firearms – confidentiality Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Cases Cited: Appellant S214 of 2004 v The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 66 Brennan v State of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 167 Bungree Aboriginal Association Limited v NSW Registrar of Community Housing [2019] NSWCATAD 61 CYL v YZA [2017] NSWCATAP 105 Fisher v NSW Police [2002] NSWADT 267 Grant v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 158 Ibrahim v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2019] NSWCATAD 41 Simring v Commissioner of Police [2009] NSWSC 270 State of New South Wales (Justice Health) and anor v Dezfouli [2008] NSWADTAP 69 Zreika v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 202 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Jacob Himo (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Hartmann & Associates (Applicant) Maddocks Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00129792 Publication restriction: In addition to the Orders set out above, pursuant to ss 64(1)(c) and (d) of the CAT Act, the contents of all paragraphs in these Reasons marked "[Not for publication]" are not to be published or released to the Applicant or the public.