NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Anberra Pty Ltd v Urban Stays Pty Ltd & Ors [2021] NSWDC 309 Hearing dates: 08 July 2021 Date of orders: 08 July 2021 Decision date: 08 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraph 28 Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application for stay of proceedings – commercial leases dispute – whether the ACT Magistrates' Court is "the appropriate court" to determine proceedings – application of mandatory considerations – whether prejudice would flow from stay Legislation Cited: Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) Leases (Commercial and Retail) Act 2001 (ACT) ss 144, 154 Service and Execution of Process Act 1992 (Cth) s 20 Cases Cited: Brimaud v Honeysett Instant Pty Ltd (1988) 217 ALR 44 Leda Commercial Properties Pty Ltd v Brenda Hungerford Pty Ltd (2018) 337 FLR 252 Toyota Material Handling Pty Ltd v Cardboard Collection Service Pty Ltd [2020] NSWDC 667 Tuggerangong Town Centre Pty Ltd v Brenda Hungerford Pty Ltd (No.3) [2017] ACTSC 301 Texts Cited: Nil. Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Anberra Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Urban Stays Pty Ltd (first defendant) Alan Jugovic (second defendant) Joseph Edward Griffiths (third defendant) Canberra Lawyers Pty Ltd (fourth defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr W Soon for the plaintiff Mr C Cassimatis for the first, second, and third defendants Mr J Reid (solicitor advocate) for the fourth defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate