NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AGC Roof Maintenance Northern Division Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2021] NSWCATAD 199 Hearing dates: 14 May 2020, 1-2 September 2020 Date of orders: 13 July 2021 Decision date: 13 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: M Easton, Senior Member Decision: (1) The respondent's amended assessments relating to payments made to the following persons in the nominated financial years are affirmed: (a) O'Haras Roofing Pty Ltd (FY2014); (b) Glenn Vazey (FY2014, FY2015, FY2016, FY2017); and (c) Luisa and Patrick McManus t/a ABQ Roofing (FY2016). (2) The respondent's amended assessments relating to payments made to the following persons in the nominated financial years are quashed: (a) PHN Roofit Pty Ltd (FY2014); (b) Nathan Barry (FY2015, FY2016); (c) Todd Burrows (FY2015); (d) Michael Chalker (FY2016); (e) Bell Roof and Gutter Maintenance Pty Ltd (FY2017); and (f) Thomas Guilbot (FY2017). Catchwords: TAXES AND DUTIES — payroll tax — independent contractor — common law employee — relevant contract — 90-day exemption — services to the public exemption — two-person exemption Legislation Cited: Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Payroll Tax Act 2007 (NSW) Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: ACE Insurance Ltd v Trifunovski (2013) 209 FCR 146; [2013] FCAFC 3 ACE Insurance Ltd v Trifunovski (2011) 200 FCR 532; [2011] FCA 1204 Antegra Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2021] NSWSC 107 B & L Linings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2008) 74 NSWLR 481; [2008] NSWCA 187 Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2020) 279 FCR 631; [2020] FCAFC 122 Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 21; [2001] HCA 44 On Call Interpreters and Translators Agency Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (No 3) (2011) 214 FCR 82; [2011] FCA 366 Roy Morgan Research Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2010) 184 FCR 448; [2010] FCAFC 52 Sweeney v Boylan Nominees Pty Ltd (2006) 226 CLR 161; [2006] HCA 19 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: AGC Roof Maintenance Northern Division Pty Ltd (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Ensor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate