NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ERI v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2021] NSWCATOD 95 Hearing dates: 21 May 2021 Date of orders: 14 July 2021 Decision date: 14 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Naida Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: 1. The decision to refuse to grant the Applicant a tattoo operator licence is set aside. 2. In substitution, the decision is made that the application for a tattoo operator licence is granted. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW - tattoo parlours – tattoo operator licence - adverse security determination - fit and proper person - public interest Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review 1997 Criminal Records Act 1991 Evidence Act 1995 Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 Tattoo Parlours Regulation 2013 Cases Cited: AJO v Director-General of Transport [2012] NSWADT 101 Allen v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2015] NSWCATAD 273 Austin v Commissioner for Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAP 179 Brown v Department of Fair Trading [2020] NSWCATAD 313 Collins v Department of Fair Trading [2019] NSWCATOD 36 Deakin v Commissioner for Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAD 2 DLY v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2018] NSWCATAD 125 Do v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2020] NSWCATOD 101 Hallman v Commissioner for Fair Trading and Commissioner of Police [2017] NSWCATAD 136 Holdstock v Department of Fair Trading [2018] NSWCATOD 200 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No.2) [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127 Larter v Commissioner for Fair Trading; Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2019] NSWCATAD 81 Lu v Commissioner for Fair Trading (No. 2) [2018] NSWCATAD 221 McDonald v Director General of Social Security (1984) 1FCR 353 Mielczarek v Commissioner of Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 5 Mumby v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 27 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Naziry v Director-General, Ministry of Transport [2004] NSWADT 40 Petas v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2013] NSWADT 137 Roberts v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATAD 218 Saadieh v Director General, Department of Transport [1999] NSWADT 68 Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2008] HCA 31 Smith v Commissioner of Police & Anor [2014] NSWCATAD 184 Wright v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 98 Texts Cited: None Category: Principal judgment Parties: ERI (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police (Second Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self-Represented) Crown Solicitor (Respondents) File Number(s): 2021/00084951 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate