NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: LNCP002 Pty Ltd v Feridun Akcan [2021] NSWSC 848 Hearing dates: 10-12 May 2021 Date of orders: 16 July 2021 Decision date: 16 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: See [242]. Catchwords: CONTRACTS — Breach of contract — alleged default by borrower under mortgage – where due date for payments disputed – whether due date varied orally or in writing by parties – held, due date was varied as advanced by lender CONTRACTS — Implied terms — Terms implied in fact – whether it was an implied term of the loan agreement that the lender would provide a loan statement upon request – where borrower had express right to early repayment of loan – where borrower had to give irrevocable notice specifying the amount to be repaid – held, necessary to imply such a term ESTOPPEL — Promissory estoppel — where borrower believed payment was due on 11th – where lender previously accepted payment on 11th – whether lender entitled to issue default notice due to failure to pay on 8th of the month – held, lender was estopped from issuing default notice CONSUMER LAW — Unconscionable conduct — In connection with goods or services — System of conduct or pattern of behaviour – where lender failed to issue loan statement without reasonable excuse – where lender entered negotiations for deed of forbearance during COVID-19 shutdown – where lender issued default notice during negotiations – where default notice issued two days before borrower believed payment was due – held, lender acted unconscionably under s 21 of the ACL CONSUMER LAW — Misleading or deceptive conduct — Representations as to future matters – where lender said it would "action" request for a loan statement "now" – where lender failed to do so – held, not misleading and deceptive conduct Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), ss 12BB, 12DA Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law, ss 18, 20, 21, 22, 232, 236 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 93 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 57(2)(b) Cases Cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd (In Liq) (No 2) [2017] FCA 709 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Medibank Private Ltd (2018) 267 FCR 544; [2018] FCAFC 235 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) v Lux Distributors Pty Ltd [2013] FCAFC 90 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt (2019) 267 CLR 1; [2019] HCA 18 Awad v Twin Creeks Properties Pty Limited [2012] NSWCA 200 B.P. Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362; [1956] HCA 81 Butt v McDonald (1896) 7 QLJ 68 City of Botany Bay Council v Jazabas Pty Limited (ACN 060 105 053) [2001] NSWCA 94 Cordon Investments Pty Ltd v Lesdor Properties Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 184 Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton [1913] AC 30 Hercules Motors Pty Ltd v Schubert (1953) 53 SR (NSW) 301 Hoyt's Pty Ltd v Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133; [1919] HCA 64 Kosho Pty Ltd v Trilogy Funds Management Ltd [2013] QSC 135 Nadrak Pty Ltd v Permanent Custodians Ltd (1994) 6 BPR 13,344 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2015) 236 FCR 199; [2015] FCAFC 50 Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 596; [1979] HCA 51 Sykes v Reserve Bank of Australia (1998) 88 FCR 511; [1998] FCA 1405 Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd v Tavares; FirstMac Ltd v Di Benedetto; FirstMac Ltd v O'Donnell [2011] NSWCA 389 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387; [1988] HCA 7 Category: Principal judgment Parties: LNCP002 Pty Ltd ACN 637 107 576 (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Feridun Akcan (Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Diamond House Jewellery Pty Ltd ACN 083 444 277 (Second Cross-Claimant) MZF Investment Group Pty Ltd ACN 626 166 854 t/as LaunchCap (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M W Young SC (Plaintiff) Mr M B Evans/Ms V Chan (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate