NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Secretary of the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment v Blacktown City Council [2021] NSWCA 145 Hearing dates: 31 May 2021 Date of orders: 15 July 2021 Decision date: 15 July 2021 Before: Bell P at [1]; Brereton JA at [83]; McCallum JA at [98] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – subpoenas – to produce documents or things – application to set aside – legitimate forensic purpose – test for determining the validity of a subpoena issued in civil proceedings – whether sufficient that the documents sought by a subpoena have "apparent relevance" to an issue in the proceedings – whether necessary to satisfy the court that the documents are likely materially to assist the case of the party issuing the subpoena – consideration of bases for setting aside subpoenas CIVIL PROCEDURE – Subpoenas – Legitimate forensic purpose – origins of concept – converse of abuse of process – whether a party issuing a subpoena will lack a legitimate forensic purpose if unable to demonstrate that documents sought by subpoena likely to assist its case – legitimate forensic purpose may be presumed where documents sought have apparent relevance to matters in issue or are capable of assisting in cross examination COURTS AND JUDGES – precedential value of decisions of Court of Appeal refusing leave to appeal. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 4, 56, Sch 1 Evidence Act 1898 (NSW) s 12 Justices Act 1902 (NSW) ss 26, 36(3) Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) s 38(1)-(2) Oaths Act 1900 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 101(2)(e) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 51.14 Cases Cited: A v Z (2007) 212 FLR 255; [2007] NSWSC 899 Air Canada v Secretary of State for Trade [1983] 2 AC 394 Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 404; [1984] HCA 85 Attorney-General (NSW) v Chidgey (2008) 182 A Crim R 536; [2008] NSWCCA 65 Attorney-General for New South Wales v Stuart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667; (1994) 75 A Crim R 8 Botany Bay Instrumentation and Control Pty Limited v Stewart [1984] 3 NSWLR 98 Brand v Digi-Tech [2001] NSWSC 425 Burchard v Macfarlane [1891] 2 QB 241 Carroll v The Attorney-General for New South Wales (1993) 70 A Crim R 162 Carter v Hayes (1994) 61 SASR 451; (1994) 72 A Crim R 387 Commissioner of Taxation v Glastonbury Steel Fabrications Pty Ltd (1984) 75 FLR 298; (1984) 15 ATR 887 Cornwell v R [2010] NSWCCA 59 CSR Limited v Cigna Insurance Australia Limited (1997) 189 CLR 345; [1997] HCA 33 D v Australian Financial Security Authority, formerly known as Insolvency & Trustee Service Australia [2017] NSWCA 50 Gould v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (2018) 333 FLR 352; [2018] NSWCCA 109 Hassan v Sydney Local Health District (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 122 Hatton v Attorney-General (Cth) (2000) 158 FLR 31; [2000] FamCA 892 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 ICAP Australia Pty Ltd v BGC Partners (Australia) Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 307 ICAP Pty Ltd v Moebes [2009] NSWSC 306 In re the Will of F. B. Gilbert (deceased) (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318; (1946) 63 WN (NSW) 176 In the matter of Force Corp Pty Ltd (Recs and Mgrs Apptd) (in liq) [2018] NSWSC 896 La La Land Byron Bay Pty Limited v The Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority [2015] NSWCA 254 Lane v The Registrar of The Supreme Court of New South Wales (Equity Division) (1981) 148 CLR 245; [1981] HCA 35 Liristis v Gadelrabb [2009] NSWSC 441 Lowery v Insurance Australia Ltd (2015) 90 NSWLR 320; [2015] NSWCA 303 Maddison v Goldrick [1976] 1 NSWLR 651 Mohareb v Saratoga Marine Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 235 National Employers' Mutual General Association Ltd v Waind [1978] 1 NSWLR 372 Nicholls v Michael Wilson & Partners Limited [2010] NSWCA 100 Norris v Kandiah [2007] NSWSC 1296 Phelps v Prothero (1849) 2 De G & Sm 274; [1849] 64 ER 123 Portal Software v Bodsworth [2005] NSWSC 1115 PPK Willoughby Pty Ltd v Baird [2019] NSWCA 48 R v Keane [1994] 1 WLR 746; [1994] 2 All ER 478 R v McPhail (1988) 36 A Crim R 390 R v Reardon (No 2) (2004) 60 NSWLR 454; [2004] NSWCCA 197 R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14; (1989) 39 A Crim R 406 R v Saleam [1999] NSWCCA 86 R v Spizzirri (2000) 117 A Crim R 101; [2000] QCA 469 Re Don [2006] NSWSC 1125 Roy Morgan Research Centre Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue of the State of Victoria (2001) 207 CLR 72; [2001] HCA 49 Santos Ltd v Pipelines Authority of SA (1996) 66 SASR 38 Sharpe v Grobbel [2017] NSWSC 1065 Simjanoski v La Trobe University [2004] VSCA 125 Summers v Moseley (1834) 2 Cr & M 477; (1834) 149 ER 849 The Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564; (1938) 55 WN (NSW) 215 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Limited (No 2) (1989) 88 ALR 90; [1989] FCA 340 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Limited [1989] FCA 311 X v Director of Public Prosecutions [1995] 2 VR 622 Texts Cited: B Coles, "The Confetti of the Justice System – Subpoenas, Justice and Third Parties" (2016) 42(3) Australian Bar Review 385 L Beck, "The Constitutional Duty to Give Reasons for Judicial Decisions" (2017) 40 UNSW Law Journal 923 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Secretary of the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (Applicant) Blacktown City Council (First Respondent) Jong Mi Hong (Second Respondent) Min Kyung Hong (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate