NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Camara v R [2021] NSWDC 317 Hearing dates: 15 July 2021 Decision date: 15 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: The appeal is upheld. The conviction is set aside Catchwords: APPEAL - Appeal against conviction CRIME - Break Enter and Steal CRIMINAL LAW − Evidence − DNA evidence − Where appellant's DNA obtained from object found at crime scene − Whether DNA evidence sufficient to establish beyond reasonable doubt appellant's presence at, and participation in, crime committed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Bryon v R [2015] 2 CrAppR 21 Charara v The Queen (2006) 164 A Crim R 39 Fitzgerald v The Queen [2014] HCA 28 Grant v R [2008] EWCA Crim 1890 Ogden v R [2013] EWCA 1294 Plomp v The Queen (2007) 228 CLR 618 R v FNC [2016] 1 Cr AppR 13 The Queen v Hillier [2007] HCA 13; (2007) 228 CLR 618 Tsekiri v R [2017] EWCA Crim 40 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Danny Camara (Appellant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr M Kwan, Legal Aid NSW (for the appellant) Ms K McCrossin (for the respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00288068 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Wollongong Local Court Jurisdiction: Local Court, Crime Date of Decision: 18 May 2021 Before: Pearce ALCM File Number(s): 2020/00288068
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate