NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Elphick v R [2021] NSWCCA 167 Hearing dates: 12 July 2021 Decision date: 21 July 2021 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Walton J at [2]; Adamson J at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to the applicant to appeal against the sentence imposed on him in the District Court on 19 January 2021. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence —The sentencing judge did not overstate the applicant's moral culpability — Applicant drove straight into the side of a highly visible vehicle on a highway with a speed limit of 110kph — Conduct constituted an egregious want of care — Failure to look properly and assess the presence of oncoming traffic created a substantial risk of collision with catastrophic consequences — The sentencing judge properly assessed the application for an ICO — Assessed the applicant's risk of reoffending low whether given an ICO or full-time custody — The purposes of general deterrence would not be sufficiently served by an ICO — Sentence was not manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 52A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 66 Cases Cited: Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Thai v R [2009] NSWCCA 314 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Luke Elphick (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Dalton SC / S Kluss (Applicant) G Newton (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate