NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Martellotta v R [2021] NSWCCA 168 Hearing dates: 12 July 2021 Decision date: 21 July 2021 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Walton J at [9]; Adamson J at [10] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal against the sentence imposed by Judge Townsden in the District Court on 28 February 2020. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — Co-offenders sentenced for the same offences — Sentencing judge took into account a further offence committed by the co-offender — Applicant alleges disparity between sentences — Whether the applicant was entitled to have a justifiable sense of grievance – whether the co-offender's strong subjective case, this outweighed the co-offender's greater involvement and further offence — Co-offenders sentenced by different judges — Whether the sentences can be explained by the different material before each sentencing judge — Co-offender gave evidence at his own sentencing and the applicant did not give evidence at his own sentencing — Agreed facts were substantially the same — Difference in material explains why the co-offender was found to have a considerably greater role than the applicant — Differential assessment of objective seriousness — No standardised language with regard to range — The effect of subjective circumstances reduced the co-offender's moral culpability — The judge who sentenced the co-offender expressly took into account the additional offence — No disparity between the sentences such as would entitle the applicant to a justifiable sense of grievance Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16BA Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), ss 11.1, 307.5, 400.9 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 10A, 32 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 10 Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 PG v R [2017] NSWCCA 179; (2017) 268 A Crim R 61 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2 Unity Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW [2018] NSWCCA 266 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel Martellotta (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Fernandez (Applicant) B Anniwell (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate