NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Urdanegui v R [2021] NSWCCA 170 Hearing dates: 14 July 2021 Date of orders: 23 July 2021 Decision date: 23 July 2021 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Walton J at [22]; Harrison J at [23]. Decision: Leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: CRIME — appeals — appeal against sentence — whether failure to take into account utilitarian value of early guilty plea Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(c) Criminal Code (Cth), s 307.2(1) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), ss 68, 79, 80 Cases Cited: Bae v R [2020] NSWCCA 35 Betka v R; Ghazaoui v R; Hawchar v R [2020] NSWCCA 191 Chuang v R; Chen v R [2020] NSWCCA 60 Weber v R [2020] NSWCCA 103 Xiao v R (2018) 96 NSWLR 1; [2018] NSWCCA 4 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bruce Urdanegui (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (Applicant) A McGrath (Crown)
Solicitors: Ross Hill and Associates Solicitors (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2018/277534 Publication restriction: N/A Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 26 July 2019 Before: Lakatos SC DCJ File Number(s): 2018/277534
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate