NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wraydeh v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited; Wraydeh v Nationwide News Pty Limited [2021] NSWCA 153 Hearing dates: 10 May 2021 Date of orders: 21 July 2021 Decision date: 21 July 2021 Before: Bell P at [1] Gleeson JA at [2] Simpson AJA at [3] Decision: Each appeal dismissed with costs Catchwords: DEFAMATION – defences – common law qualified privilege – privileged occasion – privileged communication – whether communication relevant to privileged occasion – no test of necessity – news publications based on police media releases – additional information in publications not foreign to occasion of privilege DEFAMATION – remedies – compensatory damages – whether assessment of damages manifestly inadequate – primary judge justified in using appellant's failure to correct the record as indicative that the appellant was not hurt and distressed as claimed DEFAMATION – remedies – compensatory damages – whether assessment of damages manifestly inadequate – adverse credibility findings Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), ss 25, 30 Cases Cited: Adam v Ward [1917] AC 309 Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 79; [2010] HCA 25 Andreyevich v Kosovich and Publicity Press (1938) Pty Ltd (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 357 Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 366; [2004] HCA 5 Bellino v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1996) 185 CLR 183; [1996] HCA 47 Bennette v Cohen [2009] NSWCA 60 Bowen v Hall (1881) 6 QBD 333 Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd; Carson v Slee (1993) 178 CLR 44; [1993] HCA 31 Cush v Dillon (2011) 243 CLR 298; [2011] HCA 30 Dickson v Earl of Wilton (1859) 1 F. & F. 419; 175 ER 790 Guise v Kouvelis (1947) 74 CLR 102; [1947] HCA 13 Howe and McColough v Lees (1910) 11 CLR 361; [1910] HCA 67 Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520; [1997] HCA 25 Marshall v Megna; Megna v Tory; Tory v Megna [2013] NSWCA 30 Mowlds v Fergusson (1939) 40 SR (NSW) 311 Papaconstuntinos v Holmes a Court (2012) 249 CLR 534; [2012] HCA 53 Roberts v Bass (2002) 212 CLR 1; [2002] HCA 57 Sands v South Australia [2015] SASCFC 36 Stephens v West Australian Newspapers Ltd (1994) 182 CLR 211; [1994] HCA 45 Theophanous v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd (1994) 182 CLR 104; [1994] HCA 46 Toogood v Spyring (1834) 1 Cr M & R 181; 149 ER 1044 Texts Cited: John Clement Carpenter Gatley and Richard O'Sullivan, Gatley on Libel and Slander (3rd ed, 1938, Sweet & Maxwell) David Rolph, Defamation Law (2016, Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hussein Wraydeh (Appellant) Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (Respondent) Nationwide News Pty Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Molomby SC/R Rasmussen (Appellant) T Blackburn SC/L Barnett (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate