NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Connor v R; KC v R [2021] NSWCCA 171 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 21 July 2021 Decision date: 21 July 2021 Before: Bell P Rothman J Beech-Jones J Decision: In respect of Mitchell Connor, the Court orders that: (1) The time in which Mitchell Connor can give notice of his intention to apply for leave to appeal against his conviction be extended up to and including 2 July 2021; (2) Leave to appeal be granted; (3) Appeal allowed; (4) Set aside the convictions on Counts 1 and 3 and, in lieu thereof, direct that acquittals on Counts 1 – 4 be entered. In respect of KC, the Court orders that: (1) The time in which KC can give notice of his intention to apply for leave to appeal against his conviction be extended up to and including 29 June 2021; (2) Leave to appeal be granted; (3) Appeal allowed; (4) Set aside the convictions on Counts 1 and 3 and, in lieu thereof, direct that acquittals on Counts 1 – 4 be entered. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – unreasonable verdict – two appellants convicted of two counts of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm – alleged part of group that invaded victims' unit – Crown case that all members of group entered unit or balcony – Crown case depended on proof that same group of males who walked up street returned and entered balcony area – whether Crown excluded reasonable hypothesis that at least one group member did not return down street or did not enter balcony area – appeal allowed for three appellants – judgment in respect of co-offenders determined same issue – appellants entitled to the benefit of that analysis – appellants previously refused legal aid and appeals lapsed – extension of time granted - appeal allowed. Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: SK v R; BK v R; MS v R; Sakieh v R [2021] NSWCCA 130 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mitchell Connor (Applicant) KC (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: Ms A Francis (for M Connor) Ms A Cook (for KC) Mr E Balodis (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate