NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v MAK [2021] NSWSC 875 Hearing dates: 19 July 2021 Date of orders: 23 July 2021 Decision date: 23 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: Application for extended supervision order dismissed with costs. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – serious sex offender – application for an extended supervision order – whether offender poses unacceptable risk of committing another serious offence without supervision – where offender currently living in community following release on parole – where psychiatric and risk assessment reports suggest limited to no risk of offender committing another serious sexual offence of same type – where reports suspect or fear that offender is at some possible risk of committing intrarelationship sexual violence but no history of him having done so – where offender has manageable schizophrenia secondary to acquired brain injury which presents some likelihood of reducing risk of reoffending – where State has not satisfied test of unacceptable risk to high degree of probability Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v Pacey [2015] NSWSC 1983 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) MAK (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Aitken (Plaintiff) R Pettit (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (Plaintiff) Ryan Payten Le (Defendant) File Number(s): 2021/147829 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate