NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kelley v R [2021] NSWCCA 173 Hearing dates: 05 July 2021 Date of orders: 23 July 2021 Decision date: 23 July 2021 Before: Bell P at [1]; Rothman J at [57]; Bellew J at [58] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – appeal against sentence – whether sentencing judge conflated objective seriousness of offence and moral culpability – whether there was a failure to have regard to particular evidence in relation to moral culpability. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 52A(4), 61 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 8 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 166 Cases Cited: Cooper v R [2021] NSWCCA 65 Dixon v R [2019] NSWCCA 85 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Fisher v R [2021] NSWCCA 91 Gommesen v R (2012) 62 MVR 196; [2012] NSWCCA 226 Karout v R [2019] NSWCCA 253 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 R v Killen (2005) 152 A Crim R 1; [2005] NSWCCA 17 R v Manok [2017] NSWCCA 232 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 Robertson v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2017] NSWCA 180 Zheng v R; Li v R; Pan v R [2021] NSWCCA 78 Zreika v The Queen (2012) 223 A Crim R 460; [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marlee Rose Kelley (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate