NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tucker v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 214 Hearing dates: 11 and 21 June 2021 Date of orders: 21 June 2021 (Confidentiality Order (1)) 23 July 2021 (All remaining Orders) Decision date: 23 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S E Frost, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – Firearms – Revocation of licence – No 'genuine reason' for possessing or using a firearm – Not in the 'public interest' for the licensee to continue to hold the licence – Licence since expired Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Firearms Regulation 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: None cited Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Tucker (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (Self Represented) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00082286 Publication restriction: (1) Pursuant to s 59 of the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (ADR Act), the Respondent is not required to lodge under s 58 of the ADR Act, copies of the confidential material provided to the Tribunal on 21 June 2021 (the Confidential Material).
(2) Pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NCAT Act), the publication of the Confidential Material, or any matters contained in the Confidential Material, is prohibited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate