NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chua v The Owners Strata Plan No 89866 [2019] NSWCATCD 85 Hearing dates: 6 August 2019 Date of orders: 8 August 2019 Decision date: 08 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: S Thode, Senior Member Decision: 1. A hearing on costs is dispensed with in accordance with s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. 2. The applicant shall pay the respondent's costs of the hearing thrown away by reason of the late withdrawal, limited to three hours attendance and three hours preparation, as agreed or assessed. 3. The application for costs is otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: COSTS - Strata Schemes - withdrawal of application - special circumstances Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Megerditchian v Kurmond Homes Pty L TD [2014] NSWCATAP 120 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs: Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997 ] HCA 6 Category: Costs Parties: Siew Lee Chua (Applicant); The Owners - Strata Plan No 89866 (Respondent) Representation: Siew Lee Chua (Applicant) DEA Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): SC 19/29171 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background 1. Proceedings SC 18/40601 were commenced on 18 September 2018. The applicant sought orders pursuant to s232 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 for repair and maintenance of common property. The matter was listed for hearing on 15 April 2019. The Respondent was informed at the hearing that the application was "withdrawn" by the applicant. The applicant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the proceedings, such costs to be agreed or assessed. 2. The applicant appealed the costs orders. 3. On 4 June 2019 the Appeal Panel allowed the appeal and the costs order made on 15 April 2019 was set aside. The Appeal Panel ordered the parties to exchange submissions on the question of costs and remitted the matter for hearing on the question of costs only. The parties agreed that a hearing may be dispensed with and the matter comes before me today to be determined on the papers, without further need of parties to appear. I am satisfied that the application may be determined on the papers without further need of the parties to appear. 4. I have received written submissions from the respondent dated 19 June 2019. 5. I have received written submissions from the applicant dated 5 July 2019. 6. I have received submissions in reply from the respondent dated 12 July 2019.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate