NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rafael v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2021] NSWCATAD 218 Hearing dates: 22 June 2021 Date of orders: 27 July 2021 Decision date: 27 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J S Currie, Senior Member Decision: (1) The Applicant be allowed to file his application for a review of the Chief Commissioner's decision after the period prescribed by s 99(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW). (2) The Chief Commissioner's decision under review is confirmed. Catchwords: TAXES AND DUTIES- stamp duty- real and apparent purchaser concession: Duties Act 1997, ss 55 (1) and (1A)- whether real purchaser provided all money for the purchase of the dutiable property- nature of real purchaser's purported payments – whether payments to the real purchaser were loans- whether apparent purchaser held dutiable property on trust for real purchaser- presumption of resulting trust rebutted- Applicant's onus of proof not satisfied. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW); ss 9, 63 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW); ss 28, 36. Duties Act 1997(NSW); s 55 Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW); ss 96, 99, 100. Cases Cited: Al Haddad v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2018] NSWCATAD 91 B & L Linings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2008] NSWCA 187; 74 NSWLR 481 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242 Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Pendal Nominees Pty Ltd (1989) 167 CLR 1 Cornish Investments Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (RD) [2013] NSWADTAP 25 Gauci Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1975) 135 CLR 181; (1975) 8 ALR 155 Harvey v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2021] NSWCATAD 63 Landfall Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2012] NSWADT 270 Levich Design Associates Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCATAD 215 Triantafilis v Commissioner of Stamp Duties for New South Wales [1998] NSWSC 112 Truskett v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) (1976) 6 ATR 1 Wykrota v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2019] NSWCATAD 106 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Rafael (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S T Richardson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate