NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chandrasekaran v Western Sydney Local Health District [2021] NSWSC 920 Decision date: 29 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: Verdict and judgment for each defendant Catchwords: CONTRACTS — misleading conduct under statute — misleading or deceptive conduct EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL LAW — contract — breach TORTS — economic torts — injurious falsehood EQUITY — breach of confidence — conduct constituting breach Locum appointment of psychiatrist plaintiff as a VMO by Health District, first defendant – appointment facilitated by employment agency, second defendant – conversation between clinical director and plaintiff – subsequent purported early termination – notification of concerns about plaintiff to professional and regulatory bodies – misdirected email of employee of employment agency – whether crucial conversation anodyne or sinister – whether breach of confidence – whether misleading or deceptive conduct – whether injurious falsehood – whether breach of contract – various primary and contingent analyses – all claims rejected against both defendants Legislation Cited: Health Services Act 1997 (NSW) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law, s 18 Cases Cited: Australand Holdings Ltd v Transparency and Accountability Council Incorporated [2008] NSWSC 669 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Campomar Sociedad Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CCLR 45; [2000] HCA 12 Chandrasekaran, In the matter of an application for leave to issue or file [2021] HCATrans 77 Coco v A N Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] F.S.R. 415 Corrs Pavey Whiting & Byrne v Collector of Customs (Vic) (1987) 14 FCR 434 Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459; [2001] HCA 52 Moore v Scenic Tours Ltd (2020) 377 CLR 209; [2020] HCA 17 Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388; [2001] HCA 69 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sujatha Chandrasekaran (Plaintiff) Western Sydney Local Health District (First defendant) Charterhouse Medical Pty Ltd (Second defendant) Representation: Counsel: P King and D Toohey (Plaintiff) T Wong SC and R Pietriche (First defendant) K Petch (Second defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate