NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Anthony Natoli Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2021] NSWLEC 1435 Hearing dates: 20 and 21 April 2021 Date of orders: 30 July 2021 Decision date: 30 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Douglas AC Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL – application to remove vegetation (a Sydney Red Gum) – appeal against refusal of application – whether evidence provided substantiates that the tree presents a genuine risk of damage and/or injury – whether sufficient relevant information has been provided by applicant to support appeal Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4.2 Hornsby Local Environmental Plan 2013, cl 1.2 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 39 State Environmental Planning Policy (Vegetation in Non-Rural Areas) 2017, Pt 1 cl 6, Pt 2 cll 7, 8, Pt 3 cll 9,10,11,12 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Texts Cited: Australian Standard AS4970-2009 - Protection of trees on development sites Hornsby Development Control Plan 2013 Jacobs MR, Growth habits of the eucalypts, Forestry and Timber Bureau, Canberra, 1955 Johnson J and Hadlington P, Australian trees: their care and repair, UNSW Press, 1977 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anthony Natoli Enterprises P/L(Applicant) Hornsby Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Johnson (Solicitor) (Applicant) A Pickup (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate