NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Caleo v R [2021] NSWCCA 179 Hearing dates: 21 May 2021 Decision date: 06 August 2021 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Beech-Jones J at [153]; N Adams J at [154] Decision: Leave to appeal out of time should be granted but the appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – miscarriage of justice – joint trial – whether failure to order a separate trial resulted in a substantial miscarriage of justice – where evidence tendered was admissible against one co-accused but not the other –whether applicant deprived of a real chance of acquittal – Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 29(2) Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Cases Cited: Baini v The Queen (2012) 246 CLR 469; [2012] HCA 59 DR v R [2019] NSWCCA 320 GBF v The Queen [2020] HCA 40; (2020) 94 ALJR 1037 Gilbert v The Queen (2001) 201 CLR 414; [2000] HCA 15 Hamalainen v R [2019] NSWCCA 276 Kalbasi v Western Australia (2018) 264 CLR 62; [2018] HCA 7 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Madubuko v R [2011] NSWCCA 135; (2011) 210 A Crim R 249 McKell v The Queen (2018) 264 CLR 307; [2019] HCA 5 Mraz v The Queen (1955) 93 CLR 493 at 514; [1955] HCA 59 Pham v R [2006] NSWCCA 3 R v Afu; R v Caleo (No 8) [2018] NSWSC 187 R v Alexander and McKenzie (2002) 6 VR 53; [2002] VSCA 183 R v Baartman (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 6 October 1994, unrep) R v Chami [2002] NSWCCA 136; (2002) 128 A Crim R 428 R v Gulder (1986) 8 NSWLR 12 R v Middis (Supreme Court (NSW), Hunt J, 27 March 1991, unrep) R v Patsalis & Spathis [1999] NSWSC 649; (1999) 107 A Crim R 432 R v Pham [2004] NSWCCA 190 R v Spathis [2001] NSWCCA 476 Symss v R [2003] NSWCCA 77 TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124; [2002] HCA 46 Trotter v R [2016] NSWCCA 57 Webb v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41; [1994] HCA 30 Weiss v the Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300; [2005] HCA 81 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Richard Caleo (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Dalton SC (Applicant) D Kell SC with E Jones (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate