NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of NSW v Arthurell (Final) [2021] NSWSC 953 Hearing dates: 5 July 2021 Decision date: 05 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Button J Decision: (1) The defendant is subject to an extended supervision order for a period of two years from the date of the order. (2) The defendant, for the period of the extended supervision order, must comply with the conditions annexed to this judgment. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDERS — extended supervision orders — incorporation of findings made in undisputed preliminary judgment — elderly defendant proceeding reasonably well on conditional liberty — three separate homicides committed by defendant over a period of more than two decades — established proclivity to inflict fatal harm— two-year extended supervision order imposed — dispute about conditions resolved very largely in favour of rigour Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 93X Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Act (NSW), ss 5B, 10 Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v Arthurell (Preliminary) [2021] NSWSC 482 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Regina Kaye Arthurell (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: K Curry (Plaintiff) D Barrow (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitors Office (Plaintiff) Legal Aid NSW (Defendant) File Number(s): 2020/351421 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate