NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Azzam [2021] NSWCATOD 106 Hearing dates: 19 and 20 July 2021 Date of orders: 5 August 2021 Decision date: 05 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member D North OAM, Senior Member J Zwart, Senior Member M Christensen, General Member Decision: (1) Complaints One and Two are established. (2) Pursuant to s 149C(1) of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) the registration of the respondent is cancelled. (3) The respondent may not make an application for review of Order 2 of these orders for a period of two years from the date of these orders. (4) The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: HEALTH — professional registration and discipline — complaints — Pharmacist — findings of fact — onus of proof — standard of proof — unsatisfactory professional conduct — professional misconduct Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) no 86a – s 3A Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Regulation 2008 (NSW) – Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – Sch 5, cl 9(1). Cases Cited: Director-General, Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care v Lambert (2009) 74 NSWLR 523; [2009] NSWCA 102 Health Care Complaints Commission v Ahmad [2015] NSWCATOD 103 Health Care Complaints Commission v Do [2014] NSWWCA 307 Health Care Complaints Commission v Le [2021] NSWCATOD 104 Health Care Complaints Commission v Litchfield [1997] NSWSC 297; (1997) 41 NSWLR 630. Health Care Complaints Commission v Livermore [2021] NSWCATOD 48 Health Care Complaints Commission v Nguyen [2019] NSWCATOD 166 Health Care Complaints Commission v Orr [2015] NSWCATOD 124 Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 Law Society of New South Wales v Foreman (1994) 34 NSWLR 408. Lee v Health Care Complaints [2012] NSWCA 80 Prakash v Health Care Complaints Commission [2006] NSWCA 153 Qasim v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 282 Sabag v Health Care Complaints Commission [2001] NSWCA 411 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Michael Azzam (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Bagley (Applicant) T Saunders (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate