NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Livers v Legal Services Commissioner (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 164 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 06 August 2021 Before: Ward CJ in Eq at [1]; White JA at [2]; McCallum JA at [18] Decision: Motion dismissed Catchwords: COSTS — Civil and Administrative Tribunal — disciplinary proceedings — costs incurred by a lawyer in defending allegations of professional misconduct — application for payment of costs from the Public Purpose Fund following successful appeal — statutory requirement for the Court to be satisfied that the lawyer did not engage in unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct — where solicitor admitted professional misconduct but on a basis not alleged by the Legal Services Commissioner in the proceedings before the Tribunal — proper construction of sch 5, cl 23(3) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 17, 23, 60, sch 5 cl 23(3) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(3) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 497(1) Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW), s 55 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A(6) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.16(3A), 36.17 Cases Cited: Grace v Grace (No 9) [2014] NSWSC 1239 Gray v Richards (No 4) [2017] NSWSC 1714 Livers v Legal Services Commissioner [2020] NSWCA 317 Short v Crawley (No 45) [2013] NSWSC 1541 Tjiong v Tjiong (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1981 Category: Costs Parties: Peter James Livers (Appellant) Legal Services Commissioner (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Prince SC, E Olivier (Appellant) T Wong SC, B Cameron (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate