NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lok v Yeo [2021] NSWCATAP 237 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 6 August 2021 Decision date: 06 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Suthers, Principal Member Decision: (1) The appellant shall pay the respondent's costs of the application for a stay on the ordinary basis as agreed or, if not agreed, then assessed on the basis set out in the legal costs legislation as defined in Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) s 3A. Catchwords: APPEAL – Costs – costs of application for a stay Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 60 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW), r 38, r 38A Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Cases Cited: Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 at 175; [1981] HCA 39 Champion Homes Pty Ltd v Guirgis [2018] NSWCATAP 54 CPD Holdings Pty Ltd t/as The Bathroom Exchange v Baguley [2015] NSWCATAP 21 Dyldam Developments Pty Ltd v Mewing [2017] NSWCATAP 170 Javam v Al-Amin [2020] NSWCATAP 113 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Thompson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6 AVS Group of Companies Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police [2010] NSWCA 81; 78 NSWLR 302 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Andrew Lok (Appellant) Erica Yeo (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Byrne (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate