NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Konrad v Commissioner, NSW Department of Fair Trading [2021] NSWCATAD 229 Hearing dates: 26 July 2021 Date of orders: 09 August 2021 Decision date: 09 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Naida Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: LICENSING – real estate agent – class 1 licence – pathways - transitional provisions - mandatory requirements – whether carrying on business – whether employed as person in charge Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Interpretation Act 1987 Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002 Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 Property and Stock Agents (Qualifications) Order 2019 Cases Cited: Loschiavo v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2021] NSWCATAD 102 McDonald v Director General of Social Security (1984) 1FCR 353 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2008] HCA 31 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Katherine Konrad (Applicant) Commissioner, NSW Department of Fair Trading (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant: self-represented Respondent: Customer Service, NSW Government File Number(s): 2021/112205 Publication restriction: nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate