NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: McKenzie v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2021] NSWCATAD 230 Hearing dates: 2 June 2021 Date of orders: 09 August 2021 Decision date: 09 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: The reviewable decision is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – Firearms – Revocation of licence – criminal offence – public safety - genuine reason – participation requirements - public interest Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulations 2017 Cases Cited: Aubrey v The Commissioner of Police [2005] NSWADT 266 Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9 Constantin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (GD) [2013] NSWADTAP 16 Cusumano v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWADT 50 Davos v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2013] NSWADT 7 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 60 Esterman v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATOD 70 Hill v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2002] NSWADT 218 Joseph v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCAT 31 Kocic v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (2014) 88 NSWLR 159 Lynch v Commissioner of Police (GD) [2006] NSWADTAP 43 Martin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2010] NSWADT 276 McDonald v Director-General of Social Security [1984] FCA 57; (1984) 1 FCR 354, 357 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Stamatelatos v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 156 Todorovski v Commissioner of Police [2019] NSWADT 192 Vella v Commissioner of Police [2003] NSWADT 91 Ward v Commissioner of Police [2000] NSWADT 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher McKenzie (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (self represented) Maddocks Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/351605 Publication restriction: The publication of the evidence and submissions filed by the Respondent and presented to the Tribunal in private session (the Confidential Material) is prohibited pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. The disclosure to the applicant of the confidential material is prohibited pursuant to s 64(1)(d) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate