NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ageist Pty Ltd v Samuel M Holdings Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) [2021] NSWSC 988 Hearing dates: 22, 29 and 30 July 2021 and 6 August 2021 Date of orders: 06 August 2021 Decision date: 06 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Henry J Decision: Order that that the caveats be withdrawn and the first defendant's director and the second and third defendants be restrained from lodging any further caveats without leave. Catchwords: LAND LAW – Caveats – Extension of operation of caveats – where caveats claim interests based on bad faith by mortgagee in exercising its power of sale – where bad faith alleged in relation to mortgagee's removal of property from auction and decision to sell to third party – caveats ordered to be withdrawn Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 74MA Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999 (NSW), r 2.13(1)(a) Cases Cited: Ageist Pty Ltd v More Than Skin Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1117 Ageist Pty Ltd v More Than Skin Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 1176 Barns v Queensland National Bank Ltd (1906) 3 CLR 925; [1906] HCA 26 Bayblu Holdings Pty Ltd v Capital Finance Australia Ltd [2011] NSWCA 39 Commercial and General Acceptance Ltd v Nixon (1981) 152 CLR 491; [1981] HCA 70 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Hadfield [2004] NSWCA 350 Forsyth v Blundell (1973) 129 CLR 477; [1973] HCA 20 Fuge v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2019] FCA 1621 Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd v Roberts (2016) 93 NSWLR 1; [2016] NSWCA 240 Hawkesbury Development Co Ltd v Landmark Finance Pty Ltd (1969) 2 NSWR 782 Hawkesbury Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Custom Credit Corporation Ltd (1994) 8 BPR 15,581 Inglis v Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia (1972) 126 CLR 161; [1972] HCA 74 Jonsue Investments Pty Ltd v Balweb Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 325 Kennedy v De Trafford [1897] AC 180 Oswal v Burrup Fertilisers Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (2013) 295 ALR 708; [2013] FCAFC 9 Pendlebury v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1912) 13 CLR 676; [1912] HCA 9 Perpetual Nominees Ltd v Springfield Retail Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 188 Samuel M Holdings Pty Limited v The Trust Company (PTAL) Limited [2020] NSWSC 248 Sinclair v Hope Investments Pty Limited [1982] 2 NSWLR 870 Stone v Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd (in liq) [1999] NSWCA 435 The Trust Company (PTAL) Limited v Samuel M Holdings Pty Limited [2020] NSWSC 863 The Trust Company (PTAL) Ltd v Samuel M Holdings Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 556 The Trust Company (PTAL) Ltd v Samuel M Holdings Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 556 Ultimate Property Group Pty Ltd v Lord (2004) 60 NSWLR 646; [2004] NSWSC 114 Texts Cited: E L G Tyler, P W Young and C E Croft, Fisher & Lightwood's Law of Mortgage (3rd ed, 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ageist Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Samuel M Holdings Pty Ltd (Receiver & Manager Appointed) (First Defendant) Lila Stojcevski (Second Defendant) Lupco Stojcevski (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A G Martin (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate