NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chia v Ku-ring-gai Council [2021] NSWCCA 189 Hearing dates: 22 February and 18 June 2021 Date of orders: 20 August 2021 Decision date: 20 August 2021 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Harrison J at [2] Wilson J at [78] Decision: (1) Allow the appeal against conviction. (2) Quash the conviction. (3) Order a new trial. Catchwords: ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES – appeal – appeal against conviction – where defendant appeals against conviction for injuring trees the subject of a Tree Preservation Order without consent contrary to s 125 of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 – whether defendant vicariously liable for actions of independent contractor and his subcontractors – assessment of nature and terms of instruction given and any qualifications to that instruction – whether trial judge failed to consider defence argument that defendant instructed contractor to comply with 10/50 Code – whether the instruction that contractor comply with 10/50 Code would operate as a qualification upon the width of general instructions amounting to an instruction not to fell trees beyond the 10/50 zone – conviction quashed – new trial ordered Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) s 125 Native Vegetation Act 2003 (NSW) Rural Fires Amendment (Vegetation Clearing) Act 2014 (NSW) Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW) Cases Cited: Coffs Harbour City Council v Hickey [2004] NSWLEC 531 Darling Island Stevedoring and Lighterage Company Ltd v Long (1957) 97 CLR 36; [1957] HCA 26 Director-General, Department of Environment and Climate Change v Walker Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 73 Environmental Protection Authority v McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd (2003) 128 LGERA 240; [2003] NSWLEC 70 Kondis v State Transport Authority (1984) 154 CLR 672; [1984] HCA 61 Ku-ring-gai Council v John David Chia (No 15) [2019] NSWLEC 1 Ku-ring-gai Council v John David Chia (No 16) [2019] NSWLEC 184 North Sydney Council v Moline; North Sydney Council v Tomkinson (No 2) [2008] NSWLEC 169 Stoneman v Lyons (1975) 133 CLR 550; [1975] HCA 59 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John David Chia (Appellant) Ku-ring-Gai Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Dowling SC with D Beaufils and S Gaussen (Appellant) D Buchanan SC with N Hammond (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate