NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mclaughlin v Burrows [2021] NSWCA 170 Hearing dates: 23 July 2021 Date of orders: 11 August 2021 Decision date: 11 August 2021 Before: Bell P; Meagher JA Decision: 1. Dismiss the summons seeking leave to appeal in proceeding 2021/78037. 2. Dismiss the notice of appeal in proceeding 2020/364240. 3. Applicant pay the respondents' costs of those proceedings. Catchwords: APPEAL – leave to appeal – where applicant's claims summarily dismissed on ground that statute-barred – whether primary judge erred in being satisfied that there was no arguable case that applicant was under a "disability" within meaning of Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) s 52(1) Legislation Cited: Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), ss 11(3)(b), 14(1)(b), 52(1) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(e) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 13.4 Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), ss 38, 40, 52A Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1988 (NSW), s 315 Cases Cited: Guthrie v Spence (2009) 78 NSWLR 225; [2009] NSWCA 369 Murgolo v AAI Ltd t/as AAMI [2019] NSWCA 295 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Scot George Mclaughlin (Applicant) David Wilfrid Burrows, Roger John Downs, David Laurance Potts, Paul Dante Magagnino, Peter John Chodat, Mario Quintilliani, Michael John Hatfield and Michael Paul Mantel t/as Kells the Lawyers (Respondents) Representation: Counsel: R Perla (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate