NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Turnbull v Office of Environment and Heritage [2021] NSWCCA 190 Hearing dates: 18 March 2021 Decision date: 13 August 2021 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Harrison J at [2]; Button J at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal out of time. (2) Grant leave to appeal. (3) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — accusatorial principle — admissions in civil proceedings sought to be used in subsequent criminal prosecution — plaintiff and prosecutor same legal person — admissions made voluntarily and on legal advice of counsel — admissions made in open court — applicant deposed he would not have made admissions if advised of possible criminal prosecution — use of admissions in subsequent criminal proceedings said to breach accusatorial principle — application for a stay distinguished — practical difficulties in restraining use of admissions ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING — land clearing offence prosecuted in Land and Environment Court — Class 4 and Class 5 jurisdictions — proceedings based on same alleged acts commenced in both jurisdictions – admissions made disputing extent of civil contravention of Native Vegetation Act Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 90 Native Vegetation Act 2003 (NSW), ss 12, 38, 41 Cases Cited: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Zhao (2015) 255 CLR 46; [2015] HCA 5 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2016) 242 FCR 153; [2016] FCAFC 97 Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage v Turnbull (No 4) [2016] NSWLEC 66 Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Turnbull [2019] NSWLEC 125 Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage v Grant Wesley Turnbull (No 4) [2020] NSWLEC 124 Holloway v R [2015] NSWCCA 207 Lee v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 455; [2014] HCA 20 Peters & Heffernan v R (1995) 83 A Crim R 142 R v Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commissioner (2016) 256 CLR 459; [2016] HCA 8 Strickland (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (2018) 266 CLR 325; [2018] HCA 53 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Grant Turnbull (Applicant) Office of Environment and Heritage (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate