NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of SBL Solutions Pty Ltd (subject to a deed of company arrangement) [2021] NSWSC 1003 Hearing dates: 9 August 2021 Date of orders: 9 August 2021 Decision date: 09 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Application for leave to reopen dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Interlocutory applications — Application for leave to reopen — Where leave sought to lead new evidence in respect of indemnity for liquidator's costs and as to costs of proceedings. Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58 Cases Cited: - Bailey v Palombo [2020] NSWSC 1209 - Hindmarsh Medical Clinic v Hindmarsh Family Practice Pty Ltd (1997) 38 IPR 616 - Home Management Maintenance Pty Ltd v Doyle (1992) 107 FLR 225 - Re Citadel Financial Corp Pty Ltd (subject to deed of company arrangement) (2020) 146 ACSR 220; [2020] NSWSC 886 - Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia [2011] VSCA 267 - Urban Transport Authority of New South Wales v Nweiser (1992) 28 NSWLR 471 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Wind Turbine Services Australia Pty Ltd and Cosmic Wind Services Pty Ltd (Plaintiffs) SBL Solutions Pty Ltd (subject to a deed of company arrangement) (First Defendant) Vincent Pirina (Second Defendant) Steve Naidenov (Third Defendant) SBL Solutions Services Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Rodionoff (Plaintiffs) J Horowitz (First Defendant) J Hynes/F Tao (Second and Third Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate