NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Y v The Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice (No 6) [2021] NSWDC 392 Hearing dates: 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 October 2020; 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 13 November; 2, 10, 15, 18 December 2020; 11 January; 5, 9, 18 February; 19, 31 March; 9 April; 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 May; 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11 June; 2 and 16 July 2021 Date of orders: 13 August 2021 Decision date: 13 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Judge Levy SC Decision: See paragraph [955] for orders. Catchwords: CHILD CARE APPEAL – re-hearing of Children's Court proceedings pursuant to s 91 of the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) – self-represented appellant father sought restoration of his child into his parental care following removal on account of his violent injurious behaviour – bizarre litigation conduct by appellant – finding of parental unfitness – appeal dismissed – orders of the Children's Court confirmed; PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – disrespectful behaviour of appellant in Court – referral of the papers to the Attorney-General for consideration of appellant's disrespectful behaviour in Court: s 200A of the District Court Act 1973 (NSW); COSTS – application by the Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice for substantial compensatory costs against the appellant pursuant to s 88 of the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 claiming exceptional circumstances – separate determination of that question is required after hearing the parties Legislation Cited: Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW), s 9, s 65, s 71, s 88, s 91, s 93, s 94, s 96, s 99, s 105 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56, s 57, s 58 Court Security Act 2005 (NSW), s 9 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 59 Crimes Administration of Sentence Act 1999 (NSW), s 82A Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 200A Practice Note DC (Civil) No. 5 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 12.1 Cases Cited: Angel v Hawkesbury Council [2008] NSWCA 130 Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Blacktown City Council v Hocking [2008] NSWCA 144 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1952, unreported) (1951) 217 ALR 1 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Colt Children [2013] NSWChC 5 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; 214 CLR 118 Goode v Angland [2017] NSWCA 311 Harvey v Phillips [1956] HCA 27; (1956) 95 CLR 235 HG v The Queen [1999] HCA 2; (1999) 197 CLR 414 Johnson v Page [2007] Fam CA 1235 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 Luxton v Vines (1952) 85 CLR 352; [1952] HCA 19 M v M [1988] HCA 68; (1988)166 CLR 69 Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Paric v John Holland Constructions Pty Ltd [1984] 2 NSWLR 505 Paric v John Holland Constructions Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 58 Polsen v Harrison [2021] NSWCA 23 Re Henry; JL v Secretary, Dept of Family and Community Services [2015] NSWCA 89 Re Kerry (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 127 State Authority of NSW v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (In liq) (1999) 73 ALJR 306 The Secretary of the Dept of Communities and Justice and Fiona Farmer [2019] NSWChC 5 Twynam Agricultural Group Pty Ltd v Williams [2012] NSWCA 326 Warren v Gittoes [2009] NSWCA 24 Y v The Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2020] NSWDC 674 Y v The Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice (No 2) [2020] NSWDC 762 Y v The Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice (No 3) [2021] NSWDC 19 Y v The Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice (No 4) [2021] NSWDC 81 Y v The Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice (No 5) [2021] NSWDC 117 Yarrabee Coal Company Pty Ltd & Anor v Lujans [2009] NSWCA 85 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Y (Appellant father in person) The Secretary, Department of Communities & Justice (First respondent) M (Second respondent mother) Representation: Counsel: Appellant in person Mr M Anderson (First respondent) No appearance for the second respondent mother M Ms N Adams, Solicitor (Independent Legal Representative of the child the subject of the appeal to December 2020) Mrs D Clark, Solicitor (Direct Legal Representative of the child from December 2020)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate