Lama v Roselands Services Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2021] NSWCATCD 53

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lama v Roselands Services Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2021] NSWCATCD 53 Hearing dates: Heard on the papers Date of orders: 12 February 2021 Decision date: 12 February 2021 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: D Goldstein, Senior Member Decision: 1. A hearing on costs is dispensed with pursuant to section 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. 2. Roselands Services Pty Ltd must pay Sameer Lama and Sirjana Lama's costs of and incidental to HB 20/19310 on the ordinary basis, such costs if not agreed to be assessed on the basis set out in the legal costs legislation as defined in section 3A of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014. 3. Roselands Services Pty Ltd must pay Sameer Lama and Sirjana Lama's costs of and incidental to HB 19/36627 on the on the ordinary basis to 29 March 2020 and on the indemnity basis as from 30 March 2020, such costs if not agreed to be assessed on the basis set out in the legal costs legislation as defined in section 3A of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014. Catchwords: COSTS – Calderbank Offer Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298; (2005) 13 VR 435 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd (No. 2) [2011] NSWCA 344 Singh v Roselands Services Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCATCD Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Sameer Lama (First Applicant) Sirjana Lama (Second Applicant) Roseland Services Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Contract Specialists Pty Ltd (First and Second Applicant) File Number(s): HB 19/36627 & HB 20/19310 Publication restriction: Nil