NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Le (No 2) [2021] NSWCATOD 122 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 26 August 2021 Decision date: 26 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member Decision: The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: COSTS – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – s 4 Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) – s 165, cl 13 of Sch 5D Cases Cited: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v Giannaklis (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1271 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738; [2002] NSWCA 213 Health Care Complaints Commission v Le [2021] NSWCATOD 104 Health Care Complaints Commission v Shipley (No 2) [2020] NSWCATOD 148 In the matter of Mosman & Co Pty Limited [2020] NSWSC 1245 Keen v Telstra Corporation Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 930 Kiwi Munchies Pty Ltd v Stern [2006] NSWSC 433; Leary v Leary [1987] All ER 261 Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] NSWCA 121 Pham v Enterprise ICT Pty Ltd and Others; Pham v Sebie (No. 9) [2018] NSWSC 1657 Category: Costs Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) David Le (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Respondent (Self-Represented) File Number(s): 2020/00312766 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate