NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nicholas Arthur Stokes v Molly Harriss Toyne [2021] NSWSC 1049 Hearing dates: 18 August 2021 Date of orders: 20 August 2021 Decision date: 20 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Rein J Decision: See [26], [27], [31], [32] and [35] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Implied undertakings in respect of evidence served by the Defendant in these proceedings — Release from — Special circumstances — Plaintiff seeks to use that evidence in answer to proceedings in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and District Court of New South Wales commenced by the Defendant — Consideration of whether the implied undertaking applies to the evidence — Consideration of whether, if the Harman undertaking applies to the evidence, the Plaintiff should be released from that undertaking — Held: Implied undertaking does not apply to the evidence — Plaintiff permitted to use the evidence in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and District Court of New South Wales COSTS — Party/Party — Exceptions to general rule that costs follow the event — Nature of the proceedings — Consideration given as to whether a costs order should be made in respect of the Plaintiff's application — Held: there be no order as to costs Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Cases Cited: Benecke v National Australia Bank (1993) 35 NSWLR 110 Dagi v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd [1996] 2 VR 567 Central Queensland Cement Pty Ltd v Hardy [1989] 2 Qd R 509 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; 230 CLR 89 Frigger v Trenfield (No 5) [2020] FCA 827 Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Lovell (1998) 19 WAR 316 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Helicopter Aerial Surveys Pty Ltd v Robertson [2015] NSWSC 2104 Nicholas Arthur Stokes v Molly Harris Toyne [2019] NSWSC 274 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 R, On The Application of John Patrick Davey v Ronald David Silverstein [2020] VSCA 233 Riddick v Thames Board Mills Ltd [1977] QB 881 Springfield Nominees Pry Ltd v Bridgelands Securities Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 217 Verde Terra Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council; Central Coast Council v Verde Terra Pty Ltd (No 7) [2020] NSWLEC 140 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nicholas Arthur Stokes (Plaintiff) Molly Harriss Toyne (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr N Oram (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate