NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Toller v R [2021] NSWCCA 204 Hearing dates: 28 July 2021 Date of orders: 27 August 2021 Decision date: 27 August 2021 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Davies J at [2] Beech-Jones J at [3] Decision: Application for leave to appeal refused Catchwords: SENTENCING – fraud offences – whether effect of pandemic restrictions imposed after sentence can be considered – leave to appeal refused. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Betts v R (2016) 258 CLR 240; [2016] HCA 25 Borg v R; Gray v R [2020] NSWCCA 67 Cabezuela v R [2020] NSWCCA 107 Hoang v R [2020] NSWCCA 324 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Kentwell v R (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 R v Munday (1981) 2 NSWLR 177 Rae v R [2019] NSWCCA 284 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Edward Charles Toller (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) Ms C Dodds (Crown)
Solicitors: Unrepresented (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2017/192803 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 24 April 2018 Before: Norrish QC DCJ File Number(s): 2017/192803
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate