NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kelly v R [2021] NSWCCA 205 Hearing dates: 9 August 2021 Date of orders: 25 August 2021 Decision date: 25 August 2021 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; R A Hulme J at [2]; Wright J at [28] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCING – plea of guilty – standard non-parole period offence – offence against Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 154C(2) – vulnerable elderly victim – Form 1 offence – conditional liberty erroneously considered as aggravating objective severity – sentencing judge's finding of objective severity less severe than that submitted by applicant at first instance – no error alleged in finding of objective severity as mid-range – need to resentence questionable – sentencing discretion re-exercised – no lesser sentence warranted in law – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 154C(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 54B(3) Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW), s 117(2) Cases Cited: Hillier v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2009) 198 A Crim R 565; [2009] NSWCCA 312 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566; [2006] NSWCCA 242 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168; [2004] NSWCCA 131 Zreika v R (2012) 223 A Crim R 460; [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shaun Tyrone Kelly (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Neild (Applicant) Ms E Wilkins SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate