NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Di Palma v Chimmalee (No 3) [2021] NSWSC 1066 Hearing dates: 13 August 2021 Date of orders: 13 August 2021 Decision date: 13 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Henry J Decision: See [34] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – interim preservation – freezing orders – where first defendant awaiting trial for fraud-related offences – where freezing order over first defendant's bank account permits payment of defendants' reasonable living expenses – whether in the interests of justice to grant second defendant's application for payment out of first defendant's bank account for past rental expenses – payment refused where competing claims to funds Legislation Cited: Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989 (NSW), s 18 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 23 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 25.12 Cases Cited: Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612; [1987] HCA 23 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Siriluck Fatima Chimmalee (First Defendant) Michael Roger Evans (Second Defendant)
Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (Interested Party) Ren Zhou Lawyers (Interested Party) IMB Bank (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: J Francis (Commissioner of Police, Interested Party) HWL Ebsworth (Respondent)
In person: Michael Roger Evans Ren Zhou Lawyers File Number(s): 2018/00246696 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate