NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Antonino Gaudioso v Transport for New South Wales [2021] NSWLEC 91 Hearing dates: 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18 and 19 March 2021 20, 21 and 22 April 2021 Date of orders: 27 August 2021 Decision date: 27 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Duggan J Decision: See paragraphs 162 and 163 Catchwords: COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – compensation – assessment under s 55(a) Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991– determination of market value – whether zoning a consequence of public purpose to be disregarded – rezoning unlikely absent public purpose – rezoning for residential use unlikely – no impact on market value COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – compensation – assessment – disturbance – legal fees – stamp duty – mortgage costs Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) Roads Act 1993 (NSW) Cases Cited: Eureka Operations Pty Ltd v Transport for New South Wales [2021] NSWLEC 41 Fitzpatrick Investments Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council (No 2) (2000) 108 LGERA 417 SNS Pty Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services [2018] NSWLEC 7 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Antonino Gaudioso (First Applicant) Carmel Gaudioso (Second Applicant) Transport for New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Hemmings SC and L Nurpuri (Applicants) R Lancaster SC and A Hemmings (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate