NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pharmaceutical Processing Technology Inc v Sci-Chem International Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1078 Hearing dates: 26 August 2021 Date of orders: 27 August 2021 Decision date: 27 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Williams J Decision: See orders at [96]. Catchwords: INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION – Application for interim measure under Article 17J of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration – sparing approach to exercise of the power under Article 17J – where serious question to be tried concerning validity of notices issued by defendant terminating or purporting to terminate contract – where plaintiff likely to suffer harm for which damages would not be an adequate remedy in the short-term if interim injunction not granted – where evidence does not establish that defendant likely to suffer harm in short-term – where plaintiff commenced arbitration proceedings only four days after commencing proceeding in this Court – where plaintiff accepts that continuation of injunction may be revisited by arbitral tribunal and submits that conditions for any longer-term interim injunction, including any security for the plaintiff's undertaking as to damages, are "quintessentially matters for the arbitrator" – injunction granted only for short period necessary for plaintiff to have the opportunity to apply expeditiously to arbitral tribunal for any longer term interim injunction Legislation Cited: International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth), s 16 UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, Articles 17 and 17J Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199; [2001] HCA 63 Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618 Cape Lambert Resources Ltd v MCC Australia Sanjin Mining Pty Ltd (2013) 298 ALR 666; [2013] WASCA 66 Celetem SA v Roust Holdings [2005] 4 All ER 52; [2005] EWCA Civ 618 Cherry v Steele‑Park (2017) 96 NSWLR 548; [2017] NSWCA 295 Crawford Fitting Co v Sydney Valve & Fittings Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 438 Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd v Laing O'Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd (2017) 96 NSWLR 329; [2017] NSWCA 291 Lawrence v Ciantar [2020] NSWCA 89 Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd [2016] WASCA 105 Papas v Grave [2013] NSWCA 308 Sino Dragon Trading Ltd v Noble Resources International Pte Ltd (2015) 246 FCR 479; [2015] FCA 1028 Texts Cited: Nygh's Conflict of Laws in Australia (10th ed, 2020) at [17.37]-[17.47] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Pharmaceutical Processing Technology Inc (Plaintiff) Sci-Chem International Pty Ltd (ACN 115 411 599) (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Izzo SC with Ms King (Plaintiff) Mr A Shah (sole director of Defendant, with leave) (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate