NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Carter (a pseudonym) v R [2021] NSWCCA 208 Hearing dates: 18 August 2021 Date of orders: 10 September 2021 Decision date: 10 September 2021 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Simpson AJA at [2] Bellew J at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal against sentence. (2) Allow the appeal. (3) Quash the aggregate sentence imposed on the applicant in the District Court. (4) Give the following indicative sentences: (a) count 1 – 4 years and 9 months imprisonment; (b) count 2 – 3 years imprisonment; (c) count 3 – 3 years imprisonment; (d) offence (i) on the s 166 Certificate – 6 months imprisonment; and (e) offence (ii) on the s 166 Certificate – 6 months imprisonment. (5) In lieu of the aggregate sentence imposed in the District Court, impose an aggregate sentence of 6 years and 9 months imprisonment commencing on 14 November 2018 and expiring on 13 August 2025. (6) Specify a non-parole period of 4 years and 2 months imprisonment commencing on 14 November 2018 and expiring on 13 January 2023. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Offences – Sentence – Application for leave to appeal against sentence – Drug supply offences – Where counsel for the applicant on sentence made a concession to the sentencing judge that the offending was in the mid-range – Where a finding was made by the sentencing judge in accordance with that concession – Whether exceptional circumstances had been established allowing the applicant to resile from that concession – Whether there had been a miscarriage of justice – Whether finding of the sentencing judge was reasonably open – Limited role played by applicant – Where offending had no upper limit in terms of quantity – Discussion as to the significance of the weight of the drug in such circumstances – Finding that the offending was in the mid-range not reasonably open on the evidence – Error established – Re-sentence – Unlikely to re-offend – Genuine remorse – Excellent prospects of rehabilitation – Finding of special circumstances Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bayram v R [2012] VSCA 6 FL v R [2020] NSWCCA 114 Keane v R [2011] VSCA 156 McDowall v R [2019] NSWCCA 29 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Olbrich v The Queen (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 R v Amati [2019] NSWCCA 193 Romero v R (2011) 32 VR 486; [2011] VSCA 45 Sharma v R [2017] NSWCCA 85 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Zreika v R (2012) 223 A Crim R 460; [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Carter (a pseudonym) – Applicant Regina - Respondent Representation: Counsel: A Evers – Applicant C Curtis – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate