NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Residents Against Intermodal Developments Moorebank Incorporated v Independent Planning Commission (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1501 Hearing dates: 21-29 June and 1 July 2021; mention on 17 December 2021 Date of orders: 24 December 2021 Decision date: 24 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development consent is granted to State Significant Development Application No. 7709, for the Moorebank Precinct West Stage 2 (MPW Stage 2) at Moorebank Avenue, Moorebank (Lot 1 DP 1197707, Lot 2 DP 1197707, Lot 100 DP 1049508, Lot 101 DP 1049508, Part Lot 3 DP 1197707 and Part Anzac Road and Moorebank Avenue public road reserves), subject to the conditions in Annexure A. (3) The exhibits are returned except for A, R1-1 and R2-2. Catchwords: APPEAL – objector appeal under s 8.8 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 – State significant development – intermodal facility and rail link – development consent continues to operate during the course of the proceedings – whether development impacts can be adequately mitigated or managed – modifications to approved development consent – power under s 4.55(2) not relevant to present application – whether the consent in its current modified form is a consent that the Court should grant Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.5, 4.10, 4.12, 4.15, 4.17, 4.22, 4.24, 4.36, 4.55, 7.4, 7.8, 8.8, 8.13 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 97, Sch 2 cll 6, 7, Sch 3 Interpretation Act 1987, s 80 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 39 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008, cl 7.36 State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011, cl 18A, Sch 1 cl 19 Cases Cited: Arrage v Inner West Council [2019] NSWLEC 85 Australian International Academy of Education Inc v The Hills Shire Council (2013) 196 LGERA 1 Birdon Contracting Pty Ltd v Hawkesbury City Council [2009] NSWLEC 85 Blacktown City Council v Satmell [2019] NSWLEC 93 Botany Bay City Council v Minister for Planning (2006) 148 LGERA 251; [2006] NSWLEC 194 Botany Bay City Council v Remath Investments No 6 Pty Ltd (2000) 50 NSWLR 312; [2000] NSWCA 364 Charara v Ku-ring-gai Council [2019] NSWLEC 183 Greentree v Director-General of the Department of Land and Water Conservation [2002] NSWLEC 53 Helman v Byron Shire Council (1995) 87 LGERA 349 Hope v Bathurst City Council (1980) 144 CLR 1; [1980] HCA 16 Houlton v Woollahra Municipal Council (1997) 95 LGRA 201 Mison v Randwick Municipal Council (1991) 23 NSWLR 734; (1991) 73 LGERA 349 Moto Projects (No 2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298; [1999] NSWLEC 280 North Sydney Council v Michael Stanley and Associates Pty Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 468 Prineas v Forestry Commission of NSW (1983) 49 LGRA 402 Scurr v Brisbane City Council (1973) 133 CLR 242 Sydney City Council v llenace Pty Ltd (1984) 3 NSWLR 414 Vacik Pty Ltd V Penrith City Council (unreported) [1992] NSWLEC 8 Wolgan Action Group Inc v Lithgow City Council (2001) 116 LGERA 378; [2001] NSWLEC 199 Texts Cited: Environment Protection Authority, Noise Policy for Industry (2017) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Residents Against Intermodal Developments Moorebank Incorporated (Applicant) Independent Planning Commission (First Respondent) Qube Holdings Limited (Second Respondent) Representation: E Rakowski (Agent) (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate