NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kutup v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2021] NSWCATOD 131 Hearing dates: 19 August 2021 Date of orders: 2 September 2021 Decision date: 02 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Naida Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: LICENSING – Real estate agent's licence - failure to renew – restoration application – whether failure inadvertent – whether just and equitable to restore licence Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 Cases Cited: Hamdan v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATOD 6 In the Matter of Accolade Wines Australia Limited and other companies [2016] NSWSC 1023 Kogias v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 297 Leatham v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 121 McDonald v Director General of Social Security (1984) 1FCR 353 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2008] HCA 31 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Orhan Kutup (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self-represented) Department of Customer Service (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00187712 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate