NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kumar v Registrar-General of New South Wales [2021] NSWSC 1103 Hearing dates: 22 March; 31 May and 28 July 2021 Date of orders: 31 August 2021 Decision date: 31 August 2021 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Claim for compensation from the Torrens Assurance Fund is refused. Catchwords: LAND LAW – Torrens title — Compensation for loss of interest in land – Torrens assurance fund – plaintiff held an equitable interest as unpaid vendor or as equitable mortgagee – plaintiff's agent left signed withdrawal of caveat form with director of registered proprietor – director dishonestly used form in order to remove plaintiff's caveat as part of refinancing transaction – refinancing transaction involved creation of new interests including new first registered mortgage – new first mortgage secured greater sum – first mortgagee exercised power of sale – proceeds remaining after satisfaction of first mortgage divided by agreement amongst competing claimants – plaintiff received 26% of remaining funds – whether plaintiff deprived of land as a consequence of fraud – whether plaintiff suffered loss or damage as a result of the operation of the Real Property Act – not shown that plaintiff would have been financially better off had refinancing transaction not occurred – plaintiff failed to establish that he suffered loss or damage that falls within s 129(1)(e) of the Act – compensation in any event not payable under s 129(2)(a) of the Act because any such loss or damage is a consequence of acts or omissions of the plaintiff Legislation Cited: Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW), s 5(2) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 (NSW), s 9(1)(b) Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), ss 42, 43, 43A, 120, 129(1)(e), 129(2)(a) Real Property Amendment (Compensation) Act 2000 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australia Capital Financial Management Pty Ltd v Linfield Developments Pty Ltd (2017) 18 BPR 36,683; [2017] NSWCA 99 Challenger Managed Investments Ltd v Direct Money Corporation Pty Ltd (2003) 59 NSWLR 452; [2003] NSWSC 1072 Chandra v Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd (2007) 13 BPR 24,675; [2007] NSWSC 694 Chandra v Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd [2008] NSWSC 178 Diemasters Pty Ltd v Meadowcorp Pty Ltd (2001) 52 NSWLR 572; [2001] NSWSC 495 Heid Connell Investments Pty Ltd v Registrar-General (1987) 9 NSWLR 628 Lincu v Registrar-General (2019) 19 BPR 39,351; [2019] NSWSC 568 Thomas v Registrar-General of New South Wales [2019] NSWCA 198 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mohan Kumar (Plaintiff) Registrar-General of New South Wales (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms P Lane (Plaintiff) Ms L A Walsh (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate