NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rahman v Health Secretary in respect of the Sydney Local Health District and the South West Sydney Local Health District [2021] NSWIRComm 1065 Hearing dates: 12, 13 and 14 May 2021, final submissions received 4 August 2021 Date of orders: 2 September 2021 Decision date: 02 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Commissioner Sloan Decision: The applications are dismissed Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL LAW – Termination – Statutory rights – Unfair dismissal – Security officer intervened in patient restraint – absence of direction to intervene – consideration of gravity of physical conduct – verbal altercation with co-worker following the restraint – whether conduct was misconduct warranting termination of employment – impact of termination at one Local Health District on employment at another – whether dismissal harsh, unreasonable or unjust Legislation Cited: Health Services Act 1997 Ch 9, ss 119, 121 Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 84 Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Byrne v Australia Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 Corrective Services NSW v Danwer [2013] NSWIRComm 61 Department of Health v Perihan Kaplan [2010] NSWIRComm 65 Lane v Arrowcrest Group Pty Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 427 NSW Health Services Northern Sydney Local Health District v Hargreaves [2012] NSWIRComm 123 Pastrycooks Employees, Biscuit Makers Employees & Flour and Sugar Goods Workers Union (NSW) v Gartrell White (No. 3) (1990) 35 IR 70 Shepherd v Felt & Textiles Australia Ltd (1931) 45 CLR 359 Tredinnick v Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWIRComm 14 Wang v Crestell Industries Pty Ltd (1997) 73 IR 454 Wattie v Industrial Relations Secretary on behalf of the Secretary of the Department of Justice (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 124 Western Suburbs District Ambulance Committee v Tipping [1957] AR (NSW) 273 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mustafizur Rahman (Applicant) Health Secretary (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Canceri (Applicant) A Britt (Respondent) Solicitors: WorkLawyers (Applicant) File Number(s): 2020/187907 and 2020/266802 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate