NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2021] NSWCATAD 259 Hearing dates: 28 August 2020 Date of orders: 03 September 2021 Decision date: 03 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Goodman SC Decision: Payroll Tax Assessment Notices numbered 10104232, 10104238, 10104243, 10104254 and 10104225 dated 10 April 2018 are confirmed. Catchwords: TAXES AND DUTIES - payroll tax- general medical practitioners -operator of medical centres – whether agreement between doctors and owner of medical centres was a "relevant contract" – whether exemption under s 32(2)(b)(iv) Payroll Tax Act available - whether payments from the medical centre operator to the doctors were "wages" Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997, ss 9, 63 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, s 28 Payroll Tax Act 2007 (NSW), ss 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13 and Div 7 Payroll Tax Act 2007 (Vic), s 32 Taxation Administration Act 1996, ss 11, 21, 22, 27, 30, 72, 96 Cases Cited: Accident Compensation Commission v Odco Pty Ltd [1990] HCA 43; (1990) 95 ALR 641 Bridges Financial Services Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2005) 222 ALR 599 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (NSW) v Incise Technology Pty Ltd [2004] NSWADTAP 19; (2004) 56 ATR 82 Commissioner of State Revenue v The Optical Superstore [2019] VSCA 197; (2019) 110 ATR 651 Commissioner of State Revenue v The Optical Superstore Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 524 Levitch Design Associates Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Levco Unit Trust v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCATAD 215 O'Grady v Northern Queensland Co Ltd (1989-1990) 169 CLR 356 Re Behmer & Wright Pty Ltd (1994) 28 ATR 1082 Rita Sahade v Owners Corporation SP 62022 [2013] NSWSC 1791 Singh v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2016] NSWCATAD 9 Smith's Snackfood Co Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWCA 470; (2013) 97 ATR 904 Sydney Flooring Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2017] NSWCATAD 96; 105 ATR 546 The Optical Superstore Pty Ltd and Ors v Commissioner of State Revenue [2018] VCAT 169 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate